Details
|
ID: |
AFPUB-2019-IPv4-002-DRAFT05 |
Date Submitted: |
27 Oct 2020 |
|
Author: |
Jordi Palet Martinez jordi.palet at theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company |
Version: |
5.0 |
|
Obsoletes: |
Amends: |
CPM, amend art. 5.7 |
Proposal
1. Summary of the problem being addressed by this proposal
This proposal allows establishing the mechanism to allow transfers of IPv4 resources to/from other regions and to align AFRINIC with a market that already exists and in which we are lagging behind, which is negative for the region.
2. Summary of how this proposal addresses the problem
In recent years, and with the exhaustion of IPv4, several regions have solved this problem, not only through transfers within the region itself but between different regions. This allows facilitating a dynamic in the market and by increasing the offer, reducing prices.
However, an inter-RIR mechanism has not been established in AFRINIC, which is leading the region to a situation of discrimination and scarcity of addresses, not only in the RIR itself but in the region's market, which avoids even that new businesses can be established in the region, due to the lack of addresses.
On the other hand, the fact that there is no inter-RIR policy does not prevent transfers "under the table" and, therefore, assumes that there are resources from which the history of their registration is lost, which is one of the main functions of AFRINIC.
This proposal considers that such transfers should be allowed for both legacy and non-legacy IPv4 addresses. In the case of legacy resources, this has the advantage of allowing these resources to emerge and incorporate them into the RIRs system.
Additionally, it is important to highlight that the deployment of IPv6, in some cases, may require small blocks of IPv4 addresses for transition mechanisms, or significantly increase the costs thereof, and many AFRINIC entities could, therefore, be in serious disadvantage if they do not have access to a global market, as it is currently the case.
There is no doubt that accepting this type of transfer also has its risks, and it is possible that an initial price increase will be generated, which would quickly be aligned with the rest of the global market, as is usually the case with equivalent markets.
This proposal would allow bidirectional, compatible and reciprocal transfers with all the other RIRs.
This proposal is not covering M&A, which is already being discussed in another proposal.
It is suggested that, as an editorial CPM update, if this policy is adopted, section 5.7 is moved to a new section (possibly 13), which accommodates in the future, all the transfers-related policies in a single place. This editorial modification can be done by the staff, renumbering/reordering any relevant sections, even adjusting titles/subtitles for the new section to better match the adopted text.
3. Proposal
3.1 Amending article 5.7 of the CPM, as follows:
|
Current |
Proposed |
|
5.7 IPv4 Resources transfer within the AFRINIC Region Like the other Regional Internet Registries, AFRINIC will soon exhaust its IPv4 pool. In order to meet the needs of late resource requestors, a transfer policy for IPv4 resources within the region is needed. The goal of this policy is to define conditions under which transfers must occur. The policy solves the issue of an African organization needing IPv4 number resources after the exhaustion of the AFRINIC IPv4 pool or when AFRINIC can no longer satisfy the needs of such an organization. 5.7.1 Summary of the policy 5.7.2 IPv4 resources to be transferred - must be from an existing AFRINIC member's account or from a Legacy Resource Holder in the AFRINIC service region.
|
5.7 IPv4 Resources transfers This policy applies to an organization with a justified need for IPv4 resources (recipients) and organizations with IPv4 resources which no longer need (sources). 5.7.1 Recognized transfer types Two types of transfers are recognized:
|
|
5.7.3. Conditions on the source of the transfer 5.7.3.1 The source must be the current rights holder of the IPv4 address resources recognized by AFRINIC, and not be involved in any dispute as to the status of those resources. 5.7.3.2 Source entities will not be eligible to receive any further IPv4 address allocations or assignments from AFRINIC for a period of 12 months after a transfer approval. 5.7.3.3 Source entities must not have received a transfer, allocation, or assignment of IPv4 number resources from AFRINIC for the 12 months prior to the approval of transfer request. This restriction excludes mergers and acquisitions transfers. |
5.7.2 Conditions on the source of the transfer 5.7.2.1 A source must be validated by the applicable source RIR according to their policies and procedures. A source within AFRINIC must be in good standing, be the rightful registrant of the resources to be transferred and there must be no disputes as to the status of said resources. 5.7.2.2 Source entities will not be eligible to receive any further IPv4 address allocations or assignments from AFRINIC. Source entities may, if they can show justified need, receive resources via transfer after a period of not less than 16 months (twice the window defined by 5.4.5) has elapsed from their last outbound transfer. 5.7.2.3 An organization which has received IPv4 resources from AFRINIC within preceding 16 months will not be approved as a transfer source. |
|
5.7.4. Conditions on the recipient of the transfer 5.7.4.1 AFRINIC must approve the recipient's need for the IPv4 number resources. In order for an organization to qualify for receiving a transfer, it must first go through the process of justifying its IPv4 resource needs before AFRINIC. That is to say, the organization must justify and demonstrate before AFRINIC its initial/additional allocation/assignment usage, as applicable, according to the policies in force. 5.7.4.2 The recipient must be an AFRINIC member, subject to current AFRINIC policies and must sign the Registration Services Agreement for resources being received.
|
5.7.3 Conditions on the recipient of the transfer 5.7.3.1 Recipient organizations within the AFRINIC service region must be approved with the same policies and procedures as if the request were being satisfied from the AFRINIC pool. 5.7.3.2 Recipients in other RIRs must be approved according to that RIR’s policies and procedures. |
| 5.7.4.3 Transferred IPv4 legacy resources will no longer be regarded as legacy resources. |
5.7.3.3 IPv4 legacy resources will no longer be regarded as legacy resources:
In the case of outgoing inter-RIR, the resulting status will depend on the policies in the receiving RIR. |
|
5.7.4 Required Disclosure for Transfers Each time a transfer is completed, AFRINIC will publish all related information permitted by the source or recipient, including at least:
This doesn’t exclude the publication of the same or other information as a result of the operating agreement among the RIRs. |
4. References
There are Inter-RIR policies in APNIC, ARIN, LACNIC and RIPE, which have widely demonstrated their effectiveness and have not presented problems to the respective communities, quite the contrary.
According to the existing evidence, the ARIN region appears as the origin of the transfer of the largest number of addresses to the other regions that have resource transfer policies.
- https://www.nro.net/wp-content/uploads/NRO-Statistics-2018-Q4.pdf
- http://www.lacnic.net/innovaportal/file/3277/1/2-john-sweeting-arin.pdf
Revision History
Revision History
|
Date |
Details |
| 27th Oct 2020 | Version 5: AFPUB-2019-IPv4-002-DRAFT05
|
| 12th Aug 2020 | Version 4: AFPUB-2019-IPv4-002-DRAFT04
|
| 26th Nov 2019 | Version 3: AFPUB-2019-IPv4-002-DRAFT03
|
| 2nd Nov 2019 | Version 2: AFPUB-2019-IPv4-002-DRAFT02
|
| 14th May 2019 | Version 1: AFPUB-2019-IPv4-002-DRAFT01
|
