Details
Inter-RIR Resource Transfers |
|||
ID: |
AFPUB-2018-GEN-003-DRAFT02 |
Date Submitted: |
20 November 2018 |
Author: |
Jordi Palet Martinez jordi.palet at theipv6company.com The IPv6 Company |
Version: |
2.0 |
Obsoletes: |
|
Amends: |
CPM, New art 13.0 |
Proposal
1.0 Summary of the problem being addressed by this proposal
This proposal allows establishing the mechanism to allow transfers of resources (IPv4, IPv6, ASNs) between to/from other regions and to align AfriNIC with a market that already exists and in which we are lagging behind, which is negative for the region.
2.0 Summary of how this proposal addresses the problem
In recent years, and with the exhaustion of IPv4, several regions have solved this problem, not only through transfers within the region itself, but between different regions. This allows to facilitate a dynamic in the market and by increasing the offer, reducing prices.
However, an inter-RIR mechanism has not been established in AfriNIC, which is leading the region to a situation of discrimination and scarcity of addresses, not only in the RIR itself, but in the region's market, which avoids even that new businesses can be established in the region, due to the lack of addresses.
On the other hand, the fact that there is no inter-RIR policy does not prevent transfers "under the table" and, therefore, assumes that there are resources from which the history of their registration is lost, which is one of the main functions of AfriNIC.
As a protection measure, it is considered that these transfers should only be allowed from AfriNIC to other regions, in the case of IPv4 and ASN, if they are legacy resources, regardless of the origin of the resources that come from other regions. This also has the advantage of allowing these resources to emerge and incorporate them into the RIRs system.
Additionally, it is important to highlight that the deployment of IPv6, in some cases, may require small blocks of IPv4 addresses for transition mechanisms, or significantly increase the costs thereof, and many AfriNIC entities could, therefore, be in serious disadvantage if they do not have access to a global market, as it is currently the case.
There is no doubt that accepting this type of transfer also has its risks, and it is possible that an initial price increase will be generated, which would quickly be aligned with the rest of the global market, as is usually the case with equivalent markets.
3.0 Proposal
New article 13.0 of the CPM, as follows:
Current |
Proposed |
|
13.0 Inter-RIR Resource Transfers Resources can be transferred from AFRINIC to other RIRs whose policies provide for inter-RIR transfers, and from those RIRs to AFRINIC according to the following provisions:
|
4.0 Revision History
Date |
Details |
26 October 2018 |
Version 1: AFPUB-2018-GEN-003-DRAFT01 Initial Draft Posted to rpd |
20 November 2018 |
Version 2: AFPUB-2018-GEN-003-DRAFT01 - 13f changed “ownership” to “custodianship” - 13j changed “owner” to “resource holder” - 13i changed to “AFRINIC will record in a public transfers log, all the relevant data of the transferred resource.” |
5.0 References
There are Inter-RIR policies in APNIC, ARIN and RIPE, which have widely demonstrated their effectiveness and have not presented problems to the respective communities, quite the contrary.
LACNIC is discussing an equivalent proposal.
According to the existing evidence, the ARIN region appears as the origin of the transfer of the largest number of addresses to the other regions that have resource transfer policies.